South Africa vs Sweden: Binding coverage, primary products
South Africa
0.0%
in 2022
Sweden
0.0%
in 2022
South Africa rank
60th
Sweden rank
60th
Binding coverage, primary products over time
- South Africa
- Sweden
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Sweden, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 23 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.
South Africa ranks 60th and Sweden ranks 60th of 158 countries.
Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Africa | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 86.5% | 100.0% | 13.5% | Sweden |
| 2010s | 81.3% | 100.0% | 18.7% | Sweden |
| 2020s | 53.7% | 66.6% | 12.9% | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher binding coverage, primary products, South Africa or Sweden?
- South Africa, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Sweden as of 2022.
- What is the difference in binding coverage, primary products between South Africa and Sweden?
- 0.0%, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and Sweden?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2022.
- How do South Africa and Sweden rank globally for binding coverage, primary products?
- South Africa ranks 60th and Sweden ranks 60th of 158 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, primary products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Binding coverage is the percentage of product lines with an agreed bound rate. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable. Primary products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 0-4 plus division 68 (nonferrous metals).