South Africa vs Uganda: Binding coverage, primary products
South Africa
0.0%
in 2022
Uganda
0.0%
in 2022
South Africa rank
60th
Uganda rank
60th
Binding coverage, primary products over time
- South Africa
- Uganda
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Uganda, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 22 shared years of data; in 2000 it was South Africa ahead.
South Africa ranks 60th and Uganda ranks 60th of 158 groups.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Africa | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 86.5% | 57.0% | 29.4% | South Africa |
| 2010s | 81.4% | 55.0% | 26.3% | South Africa |
| 2020s | 53.7% | 36.6% | 17.1% | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher binding coverage, primary products, South Africa or Uganda?
- South Africa, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Uganda as of 2022.
- What is the difference in binding coverage, primary products between South Africa and Uganda?
- 0.0%, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and Uganda?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2022.
- How do South Africa and Uganda rank globally for binding coverage, primary products?
- South Africa ranks 60th and Uganda ranks 60th of 158 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, primary products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Binding coverage is the percentage of product lines with an agreed bound rate. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable. Primary products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 0-4 plus division 68 (nonferrous metals).