Togo vs Zambia: Binding coverage, primary products
Togo
0.0%
in 2022
Zambia
0.0%
in 2022
Togo rank
60th
Zambia rank
60th
Binding coverage, primary products over time
- Togo
- Zambia
How they compare
Togo currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Zambia, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 20 shared years of data; in 1997 it was Togo ahead.
Togo ranks 60th and Zambia ranks 60th of 158 countries.
Togo has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Togo | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 57.5% | 57.4% | 0.1% | Togo |
| 2000s | 56.4% | 56.4% | 0.0% | Togo |
| 2010s | 54.9% | 54.3% | 0.6% | Togo |
| 2020s | 36.4% | 36.3% | 0.0% | Togo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher binding coverage, primary products, Togo or Zambia?
- Togo, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Zambia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in binding coverage, primary products between Togo and Zambia?
- 0.0%, with Togo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Togo and Zambia?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2022.
- How do Togo and Zambia rank globally for binding coverage, primary products?
- Togo ranks 60th and Zambia ranks 60th of 158 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, primary products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Binding coverage is the percentage of product lines with an agreed bound rate. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable. Primary products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 0-4 plus division 68 (nonferrous metals).