Tunisia vs Zimbabwe: Binding coverage, primary products
Tunisia
63.1%
in 2016
Zimbabwe
69.2%
in 2021
Tunisia rank
51st
Zimbabwe rank
48th
Binding coverage, primary products over time
- Tunisia
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 69.2% against 63.1% in Tunisia, a difference of 6.1%.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Tunisia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Tunisia ahead.
Tunisia ranks 51st and Zimbabwe ranks 48th of 158 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Tunisia averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Tunisia | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 67.7% | 66.6% | 1.1% | Tunisia |
| 2000s | 67.3% | 66.1% | 1.2% | Tunisia |
| 2010s | 64.2% | 67.1% | 2.8% | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher binding coverage, primary products, Tunisia or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 69.2% against 63.1% in Tunisia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in binding coverage, primary products between Tunisia and Zimbabwe?
- 6.1%, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Tunisia and Zimbabwe?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2016.
- How do Tunisia and Zimbabwe rank globally for binding coverage, primary products?
- Tunisia ranks 51st and Zimbabwe ranks 48th of 158 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, primary products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Binding coverage is the percentage of product lines with an agreed bound rate. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable. Primary products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 0-4 plus division 68 (nonferrous metals).