United Kingdom vs Zambia: Binding coverage, primary products
United Kingdom
0.0%
in 2022
Zambia
0.0%
in 2022
United Kingdom rank
60th
Zambia rank
60th
Binding coverage, primary products over time
- United Kingdom
- Zambia
How they compare
United Kingdom currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Zambia, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 19 shared years of data; in 2001 it was United Kingdom ahead.
United Kingdom ranks 60th and Zambia ranks 60th of 158 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, United Kingdom averaged higher in 2 and Zambia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | United Kingdom | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100.0% | 56.4% | 43.6% | United Kingdom |
| 2010s | 100.0% | 54.3% | 45.7% | United Kingdom |
| 2020s | 0.0% | 36.3% | 36.3% | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher binding coverage, primary products, United Kingdom or Zambia?
- United Kingdom, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Zambia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in binding coverage, primary products between United Kingdom and Zambia?
- 0.0%, with United Kingdom ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for United Kingdom and Zambia?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2022.
- How do United Kingdom and Zambia rank globally for binding coverage, primary products?
- United Kingdom ranks 60th and Zambia ranks 60th of 158 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, primary products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Binding coverage is the percentage of product lines with an agreed bound rate. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable. Primary products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 0-4 plus division 68 (nonferrous metals).