Iceland vs Oman: Bound rate, simple mean, all products
Iceland
13.8%
in 2021
Oman
14.1%
in 2021
Iceland rank
104th
Oman rank
103rd
Bound rate, simple mean, all products over time
- Iceland
- Oman
How they compare
Oman currently reports 14.1% against 13.8% in Iceland, a difference of 0.3%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Oman ahead.
Iceland ranks 104th and Oman ranks 103rd of 157 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 2 and Oman in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Oman | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 22.8% | 13.7% | 9.1% | Iceland |
| 2010s | 18.9% | 14.0% | 4.9% | Iceland |
| 2020s | 13.8% | 14.1% | 0.2% | Oman |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bound rate, simple mean, all products, Iceland or Oman?
- Oman, at 14.1% against 13.8% in Iceland as of 2021.
- What is the difference in bound rate, simple mean, all products between Iceland and Oman?
- 0.3%, with Oman ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Oman?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2021.
- How do Iceland and Oman rank globally for bound rate, simple mean, all products?
- Iceland ranks 104th and Oman ranks 103rd of 157 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Bound rate, simple mean, all products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Simple mean bound rate is the unweighted average of all the lines in the tariff schedule in which bound rates have been set. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable.