Myanmar vs Zimbabwe: Bound rate, simple mean, all products
Myanmar
84.3%
in 2022
Zimbabwe
89.6%
in 2021
Myanmar rank
14th
Zimbabwe rank
11th
Bound rate, simple mean, all products over time
- Myanmar
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 89.6% against 84.3% in Myanmar, a difference of 5.3%.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Myanmar's.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
Myanmar ranks 14th and Zimbabwe ranks 11th of 157 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Myanmar | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 79.4% | 86.4% | 6.9% | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 79.5% | 87.5% | 8.0% | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 83.8% | 89.4% | 5.6% | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 84.3% | 89.6% | 5.3% | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bound rate, simple mean, all products, Myanmar or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 89.6% against 84.3% in Myanmar as of 2021.
- What is the difference in bound rate, simple mean, all products between Myanmar and Zimbabwe?
- 5.3%, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Myanmar and Zimbabwe?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2021.
- How do Myanmar and Zimbabwe rank globally for bound rate, simple mean, all products?
- Myanmar ranks 14th and Zimbabwe ranks 11th of 157 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Bound rate, simple mean, all products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Simple mean bound rate is the unweighted average of all the lines in the tariff schedule in which bound rates have been set. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable.