Rwanda vs Zimbabwe: Bound rate, simple mean, all products

Rwanda
89.2%
in 2021
Zimbabwe
89.6%
in 2021
Rwanda rank
12th
Zimbabwe rank
11th

Bound rate, simple mean, all products over time

  • Rwanda
  • Zimbabwe
020406080100199620082021

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 89.6% against 89.2% in Rwanda, a difference of 0.4%.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Rwanda ahead.

Rwanda ranks 12th and Zimbabwe ranks 11th of 157 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Rwanda averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Rwanda Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s 89.6% 87.2% 2.3% Rwanda
2010s 89.3% 89.2% 0.1% Rwanda
2020s 89.2% 89.6% 0.4% Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher bound rate, simple mean, all products, Rwanda or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 89.6% against 89.2% in Rwanda as of 2021.
What is the difference in bound rate, simple mean, all products between Rwanda and Zimbabwe?
0.4%, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Zimbabwe?
10 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
How do Rwanda and Zimbabwe rank globally for bound rate, simple mean, all products?
Rwanda ranks 12th and Zimbabwe ranks 11th of 157 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Bound rate, simple mean, all products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Bound rate, simple mean, all products (%)
Unit
%
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
158 places, 3,133 data points, 1995–2022
Last refreshed

Simple mean bound rate is the unweighted average of all the lines in the tariff schedule in which bound rates have been set. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable.