Chile vs Eswatini: Bound rate, simple mean, primary products
Bound rate, simple mean, primary products over time
- Chile
- Eswatini
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 27.4% against 25.6% in Chile, a difference of 1.8%.
That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.
Across all 19 years both countries report, Eswatini has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 87th and Eswatini ranks 84th of 157 countries.
Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 25.6% | 26.9% | 1.3% | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 25.6% | 27.2% | 1.6% | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 25.6% | 27.4% | 1.8% | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bound rate, simple mean, primary products, Chile or Eswatini?
- Eswatini, at 27.4% against 25.6% in Chile as of 2021.
- What is the difference in bound rate, simple mean, primary products between Chile and Eswatini?
- 1.8%, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Eswatini?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2021.
- How do Chile and Eswatini rank globally for bound rate, simple mean, primary products?
- Chile ranks 87th and Eswatini ranks 84th of 157 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Bound rate, simple mean, primary products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Simple mean bound rate is the unweighted average of all the lines in the tariff schedule in which bound rates have been set. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable. Primary products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 0-4 plus division 68 (nonferrous metals).