China vs Singapore: Bound rate, simple mean, primary products
Bound rate, simple mean, primary products over time
- China
- Singapore
How they compare
China currently reports 11.4% against 9.4% in Singapore, a difference of 2.0%.
That makes China's figure about 1.2 times Singapore's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2001 it was China ahead.
China ranks 110th and Singapore ranks 112th of 157 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, China averaged higher in 1 and Singapore in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 11.3% | 15.1% | 3.8% | Singapore |
| 2010s | 11.4% | 15.6% | 4.3% | Singapore |
| 2020s | 11.4% | 9.4% | 2.0% | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bound rate, simple mean, primary products, China or Singapore?
- China, at 11.4% against 9.4% in Singapore as of 2021.
- What is the difference in bound rate, simple mean, primary products between China and Singapore?
- 2.0%, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Singapore?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2021.
- How do China and Singapore rank globally for bound rate, simple mean, primary products?
- China ranks 110th and Singapore ranks 112th of 157 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Bound rate, simple mean, primary products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Simple mean bound rate is the unweighted average of all the lines in the tariff schedule in which bound rates have been set. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable. Primary products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 0-4 plus division 68 (nonferrous metals).