Congo vs Namibia: Bound rate, simple mean, primary products
Congo
30.0%
in 2015
Namibia
27.5%
in 2021
Congo rank
79th
Namibia rank
82nd
Bound rate, simple mean, primary products over time
- Congo
- Namibia
How they compare
Congo currently reports 30.0% against 27.5% in Namibia, a difference of 2.5%.
That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Namibia's.
Across all 13 years both countries report, Congo has been ahead every year.
Congo ranks 79th and Namibia ranks 82nd of 157 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 30.0% | 27.0% | 3.0% | Congo |
| 2010s | 30.0% | 27.3% | 2.7% | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bound rate, simple mean, primary products, Congo or Namibia?
- Congo, at 30.0% against 27.5% in Namibia as of 2015.
- What is the difference in bound rate, simple mean, primary products between Congo and Namibia?
- 2.5%, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Namibia?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2015.
- How do Congo and Namibia rank globally for bound rate, simple mean, primary products?
- Congo ranks 79th and Namibia ranks 82nd of 157 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Bound rate, simple mean, primary products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Simple mean bound rate is the unweighted average of all the lines in the tariff schedule in which bound rates have been set. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable. Primary products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 0-4 plus division 68 (nonferrous metals).