Iceland vs Oman: Bound rate, simple mean, primary products
Iceland
22.6%
in 2021
Oman
22.5%
in 2021
Iceland rank
93rd
Oman rank
94th
Bound rate, simple mean, primary products over time
- Iceland
- Oman
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 22.6% against 22.5% in Oman, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Iceland ahead.
Iceland ranks 93rd and Oman ranks 94th of 157 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Oman | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 62.1% | 22.5% | 39.6% | Iceland |
| 2010s | 41.6% | 22.4% | 19.1% | Iceland |
| 2020s | 22.6% | 22.5% | 0.1% | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bound rate, simple mean, primary products, Iceland or Oman?
- Iceland, at 22.6% against 22.5% in Oman as of 2021.
- What is the difference in bound rate, simple mean, primary products between Iceland and Oman?
- 0.1%, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Oman?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2021.
- How do Iceland and Oman rank globally for bound rate, simple mean, primary products?
- Iceland ranks 93rd and Oman ranks 94th of 157 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Bound rate, simple mean, primary products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Simple mean bound rate is the unweighted average of all the lines in the tariff schedule in which bound rates have been set. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable. Primary products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 0-4 plus division 68 (nonferrous metals).