Malawi vs Zimbabwe: Bound rate, simple mean, primary products
Bound rate, simple mean, primary products over time
- Malawi
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 111.9% against 102.5% in Malawi, a difference of 9.4%.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Malawi's.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
Malawi ranks 10th and Zimbabwe ranks 7th of 157 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 107.8% | 121.7% | 13.9% | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 108.0% | 121.8% | 13.7% | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 104.4% | 115.4% | 11.0% | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 102.5% | 111.9% | 9.3% | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bound rate, simple mean, primary products, Malawi or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 111.9% against 102.5% in Malawi as of 2021.
- What is the difference in bound rate, simple mean, primary products between Malawi and Zimbabwe?
- 9.4%, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Zimbabwe?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2021.
- How do Malawi and Zimbabwe rank globally for bound rate, simple mean, primary products?
- Malawi ranks 10th and Zimbabwe ranks 7th of 157 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Bound rate, simple mean, primary products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Simple mean bound rate is the unweighted average of all the lines in the tariff schedule in which bound rates have been set. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable. Primary products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 0-4 plus division 68 (nonferrous metals).