Tanzania vs Zambia: Bound rate, simple mean, primary products
Tanzania
120.0%
in 2021
Zambia
120.4%
in 2021
Tanzania rank
5th
Zambia rank
4th
Bound rate, simple mean, primary products over time
- Tanzania
- Zambia
How they compare
Zambia currently reports 120.4% against 120.0% in Tanzania, a difference of 0.4%.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Zambia has been ahead every year.
Tanzania ranks 5th and Zambia ranks 4th of 157 countries.
Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Tanzania | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 120.0% | 120.5% | 0.5% | Zambia |
| 2000s | 120.0% | 120.5% | 0.5% | Zambia |
| 2010s | 120.0% | 120.5% | 0.5% | Zambia |
| 2020s | 120.0% | 120.4% | 0.4% | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bound rate, simple mean, primary products, Tanzania or Zambia?
- Zambia, at 120.4% against 120.0% in Tanzania as of 2021.
- What is the difference in bound rate, simple mean, primary products between Tanzania and Zambia?
- 0.4%, with Zambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Tanzania and Zambia?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2021.
- How do Tanzania and Zambia rank globally for bound rate, simple mean, primary products?
- Tanzania ranks 5th and Zambia ranks 4th of 157 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Bound rate, simple mean, primary products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Simple mean bound rate is the unweighted average of all the lines in the tariff schedule in which bound rates have been set. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable. Primary products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 0-4 plus division 68 (nonferrous metals).