Zambia vs Zimbabwe: Bound rate, simple mean, primary products
Bound rate, simple mean, primary products over time
- Zambia
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zambia currently reports 120.4% against 111.9% in Zimbabwe, a difference of 8.5%.
That makes Zambia's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 1997 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Zambia ranks 4th and Zimbabwe ranks 7th of 157 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Zambia averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Zambia | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 120.5% | 122.0% | 1.5% | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 120.5% | 120.4% | 0.1% | Zambia |
| 2010s | 120.5% | 115.4% | 5.1% | Zambia |
| 2020s | 120.4% | 111.9% | 8.6% | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bound rate, simple mean, primary products, Zambia or Zimbabwe?
- Zambia, at 120.4% against 111.9% in Zimbabwe as of 2021.
- What is the difference in bound rate, simple mean, primary products between Zambia and Zimbabwe?
- 8.5%, with Zambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Zambia and Zimbabwe?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2021.
- How do Zambia and Zimbabwe rank globally for bound rate, simple mean, primary products?
- Zambia ranks 4th and Zimbabwe ranks 7th of 157 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Bound rate, simple mean, primary products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Simple mean bound rate is the unweighted average of all the lines in the tariff schedule in which bound rates have been set. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable. Primary products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 0-4 plus division 68 (nonferrous metals).