Lithuania vs Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income): Commercial service exports (current US$), per unit of GDP

Lithuania
0.3019 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
0.0405 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Lithuania rank
31st
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) rank
33rd

Commercial service exports (current US$), per unit of GDP over time

  • Lithuania
  • Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
00.10.20.3197720012025

How they compare

Lithuania currently reports 0.3019 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0405 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income), a difference of 0.2614 current US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Lithuania's figure about 7.5 times Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)'s.

Across all 30 years both countries report, Lithuania has been ahead every year.

Lithuania ranks 31st and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 33rd of 198 countries.

Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lithuania Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) Difference Ahead
1990s 0.1025 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0267 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0758 current US$ per US$ of GDP Lithuania
2000s 0.1146 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0351 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0795 current US$ per US$ of GDP Lithuania
2010s 0.1679 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0324 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1354 current US$ per US$ of GDP Lithuania
2020s 0.2524 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0308 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2216 current US$ per US$ of GDP Lithuania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher commercial service exports (current us$), per unit of gdp, Lithuania or Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
Lithuania, at 0.3019 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0405 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) as of 2025.
What is the difference in commercial service exports (current us$), per unit of gdp between Lithuania and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
0.2614 current US$ per US$ of GDP, with Lithuania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
30 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2024.
How do Lithuania and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) rank globally for commercial service exports (current us$), per unit of gdp?
Lithuania ranks 31st and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 33rd of 198 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Commercial service exports (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lithuania vs Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income): Commercial service exports (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/commercial-service-exports-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/lithuania/sub-saharan-africa-excluding-high-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/commercial-service-exports-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/lithuania/sub-saharan-africa-excluding-high-income/">Lithuania vs Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income): Commercial service exports (current US$), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Commercial service exports (current US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
current US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
243 places, 9,651 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Commercial service exports (current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.