Singapore vs World: Commercial service imports (current US$), per square kilometre

Singapore
448.35 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
World
56,753 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Singapore rank
1st
World rank
3rd

Commercial service imports (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Singapore
  • World
0100.0M200.0M300.0M400.0M197219972023

How they compare

Singapore currently reports 448.35 million current US$ per square kilometre against 56,753 current US$ per square kilometre in World, a difference of 448.29 million current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Singapore's figure about 7,899.9 times World's.

Across all 45 years both countries report, Singapore has been ahead every year.

Singapore ranks 1st and World ranks 3rd of 198 countries.

Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Singapore World Difference Ahead
1970s 3.04 million current US$ per square kilometre 3,547 current US$ per square kilometre 3.04 million current US$ per square kilometre Singapore
1980s 6.24 million current US$ per square kilometre 4,896 current US$ per square kilometre 6.23 million current US$ per square kilometre Singapore
1990s 24.63 million current US$ per square kilometre 9,637 current US$ per square kilometre 24.62 million current US$ per square kilometre Singapore
2000s 79.91 million current US$ per square kilometre 19,850 current US$ per square kilometre 79.89 million current US$ per square kilometre Singapore
2010s 222.87 million current US$ per square kilometre 37,780 current US$ per square kilometre 222.83 million current US$ per square kilometre Singapore
2020s 377.12 million current US$ per square kilometre 47,692 current US$ per square kilometre 377.07 million current US$ per square kilometre Singapore

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher commercial service imports (current us$), per square kilometre, Singapore or World?
Singapore, at 448.35 million current US$ per square kilometre against 56,753 current US$ per square kilometre in World as of 2023.
What is the difference in commercial service imports (current us$), per square kilometre between Singapore and World?
448.29 million current US$ per square kilometre, with Singapore ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Singapore and World?
45 years are reported by both, from 1979 to 2023.
How do Singapore and World rank globally for commercial service imports (current us$), per square kilometre?
Singapore ranks 1st and World ranks 3rd of 198 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Commercial service imports (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Singapore vs World: Commercial service imports (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/commercial-service-imports-current-us-per-square-kilometre/singapore/world/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/commercial-service-imports-current-us-per-square-kilometre/singapore/world/">Singapore vs World: Commercial service imports (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Commercial service imports (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
245 places, 9,326 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Commercial service imports (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.