Cayman Islands vs Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income): Commercial service imports (current US$), per unit of GDP

Cayman Islands
0.2565 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)
0.063 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Cayman Islands rank
22nd
Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) rank
21st

Commercial service imports (current US$), per unit of GDP over time

  • Cayman Islands
  • Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)
0.050.10.150.20.25199520092024

How they compare

Cayman Islands currently reports 0.2565 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.063 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income), a difference of 0.1935 current US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Cayman Islands's figure about 4.1 times Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)'s.

Across all 9 years both countries report, Cayman Islands has been ahead every year.

Cayman Islands ranks 22nd and Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) ranks 21st of 198 countries.

Cayman Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cayman Islands Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) Difference Ahead
2010s 0.2383 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0579 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1803 current US$ per US$ of GDP Cayman Islands
2020s 0.2434 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0594 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.184 current US$ per US$ of GDP Cayman Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher commercial service imports (current us$), per unit of gdp, Cayman Islands or Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)?
Cayman Islands, at 0.2565 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.063 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) as of 2024.
What is the difference in commercial service imports (current us$), per unit of gdp between Cayman Islands and Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)?
0.1935 current US$ per US$ of GDP, with Cayman Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cayman Islands and Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)?
9 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2024.
How do Cayman Islands and Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) rank globally for commercial service imports (current us$), per unit of gdp?
Cayman Islands ranks 22nd and Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) ranks 21st of 198 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Commercial service imports (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cayman Islands vs Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income): Commercial service imports (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/commercial-service-imports-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/cayman-islands/europe-and-central-asia-excluding-high-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/commercial-service-imports-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/cayman-islands/europe-and-central-asia-excluding-high-income/">Cayman Islands vs Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income): Commercial service imports (current US$), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Commercial service imports (current US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
current US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
245 places, 9,662 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Commercial service imports (current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.