IDA blend vs Latvia: Computer, communications and other services
Computer, communications and other services over time
- IDA blend
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 53.3% against 30.1% in IDA blend, a difference of 23.2%.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.8 times IDA blend's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 1992 it was IDA blend ahead.
IDA blend ranks 37th and Latvia ranks 40th of 47 groups.
Across the 4 decades both report, IDA blend averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | IDA blend | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 33.0% | 12.5% | 20.5% | IDA blend |
| 2000s | 30.6% | 33.0% | 2.4% | Latvia |
| 2010s | 32.4% | 36.6% | 4.2% | Latvia |
| 2020s | 32.2% | 51.0% | 18.9% | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher computer, communications and other services, IDA blend or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 53.3% against 30.1% in IDA blend as of 2025.
- What is the difference in computer, communications and other services between IDA blend and Latvia?
- 23.2%, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for IDA blend and Latvia?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do IDA blend and Latvia rank globally for computer, communications and other services?
- IDA blend ranks 37th and Latvia ranks 40th of 47 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Balance of Payments Statistics Yearbook and data files, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Computer, communications and other services (% of commercial service imports). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Computer, communications and other services include such activities as international telecommunications, and postal and courier services; computer data; news-related service transactions between residents and nonresidents; construction services; royalties and license fees; miscellaneous business, professional, and technical services; and personal, cultural, and recreational services. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of service imports which are commercial services provided by non-residents to residents.