Latvia vs Singapore: Computer, communications and other services
Computer, communications and other services over time
- Latvia
- Singapore
How they compare
Singapore currently reports 53.4% against 53.3% in Latvia, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Singapore ahead.
Latvia ranks 40th and Singapore ranks 39th of 198 countries.
Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 12.5% | 29.0% | 16.4% | Singapore |
| 2000s | 33.0% | 45.8% | 12.7% | Singapore |
| 2010s | 36.6% | 50.7% | 14.1% | Singapore |
| 2020s | 51.4% | 52.8% | 1.5% | Singapore |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher computer, communications and other services, Latvia or Singapore?
- Singapore, at 53.4% against 53.3% in Latvia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in computer, communications and other services between Latvia and Singapore?
- 0.1%, with Singapore ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Singapore?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2025.
- How do Latvia and Singapore rank globally for computer, communications and other services?
- Latvia ranks 40th and Singapore ranks 39th of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Balance of Payments Statistics Yearbook and data files, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Computer, communications and other services (% of commercial service imports). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Computer, communications and other services include such activities as international telecommunications, and postal and courier services; computer data; news-related service transactions between residents and nonresidents; construction services; royalties and license fees; miscellaneous business, professional, and technical services; and personal, cultural, and recreational services. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of service imports which are commercial services provided by non-residents to residents.