Republic of Korea vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Dealing with construction permits: Building quality control index
Dealing with construction permits: Building quality control index over time
- Republic of Korea
- Tanzania, United Republic of
How they compare
Republic of Korea currently reports 12 DB16-20 methodology against 12 DB16-20 methodology in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Tanzania, United Republic of has been ahead every year.
Republic of Korea ranks 50th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 50th of 186 countries.
Tanzania, United Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: building quality control index, Republic of Korea or Tanzania, United Republic of?
- Republic of Korea, at 12 DB16-20 methodology against 12 DB16-20 methodology in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: building quality control index between Republic of Korea and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Republic of Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Republic of Korea and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Republic of Korea and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for dealing with construction permits: building quality control index?
- Republic of Korea ranks 50th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 50th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Building quality control index (0-15) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The building quality control index is the sum of the following six indices: quality of building regulations, quality control before construction, quality control during construction, quality control after construction, liability and insurance regimes and professional certifications. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.