Montenegro vs Papua New Guinea: Dealing with construction permits: Building quality control index
Dealing with construction permits: Building quality control index over time
- Montenegro
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Montenegro currently reports 10 DB16-20 methodology against 10 DB16-20 methodology in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Montenegro ahead.
Montenegro ranks 105th and Papua New Guinea ranks 105th of 186 countries.
Montenegro has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: building quality control index, Montenegro or Papua New Guinea?
- Montenegro, at 10 DB16-20 methodology against 10 DB16-20 methodology in Papua New Guinea as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: building quality control index between Montenegro and Papua New Guinea?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Montenegro ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Montenegro and Papua New Guinea?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Montenegro and Papua New Guinea rank globally for dealing with construction permits: building quality control index?
- Montenegro ranks 105th and Papua New Guinea ranks 105th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Building quality control index (0-15) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The building quality control index is the sum of the following six indices: quality of building regulations, quality control before construction, quality control during construction, quality control after construction, liability and insurance regimes and professional certifications. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.