San Marino vs Singapore: Dealing with construction permits: Building quality control index
San Marino
13 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Singapore
13 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
San Marino rank
23rd
Singapore rank
23rd
Dealing with construction permits: Building quality control index over time
- San Marino
- Singapore
How they compare
San Marino currently reports 13 DB16-20 methodology against 13 DB16-20 methodology in Singapore, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was San Marino ahead.
San Marino ranks 23rd and Singapore ranks 23rd of 186 countries.
San Marino has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: building quality control index, San Marino or Singapore?
- San Marino, at 13 DB16-20 methodology against 13 DB16-20 methodology in Singapore as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: building quality control index between San Marino and Singapore?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with San Marino ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for San Marino and Singapore?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do San Marino and Singapore rank globally for dealing with construction permits: building quality control index?
- San Marino ranks 23rd and Singapore ranks 23rd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Building quality control index (0-15) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The building quality control index is the sum of the following six indices: quality of building regulations, quality control before construction, quality control during construction, quality control after construction, liability and insurance regimes and professional certifications. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.