Afghanistan vs Equatorial Guinea: Dealing with construction permits: Building quality control index
Afghanistan
20
in 2019
Equatorial Guinea
6.67
in 2019
Afghanistan rank
181st
Equatorial Guinea rank
184th
Dealing with construction permits: Building quality control index over time
- Afghanistan
- Equatorial Guinea
How they compare
Afghanistan currently reports 20 against 6.67 in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 13.33.
That makes Afghanistan's figure about 3.0 times Equatorial Guinea's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Afghanistan has been ahead every year.
Afghanistan ranks 181st and Equatorial Guinea ranks 184th of 191 countries.
Afghanistan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: building quality control index, Afghanistan or Equatorial Guinea?
- Afghanistan, at 20 against 6.67 in Equatorial Guinea as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: building quality control index between Afghanistan and Equatorial Guinea?
- 13.33, with Afghanistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Equatorial Guinea?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Afghanistan and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for dealing with construction permits: building quality control index?
- Afghanistan ranks 181st and Equatorial Guinea ranks 184th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Building quality control index (0-15) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the building quality control index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.