Bangladesh vs Congo, Democratic Republic of the: Dealing with construction permits: Building quality control index
Bangladesh
66.67
in 2019
Congo, Democratic Republic of the
66.67
in 2019
Bangladesh rank
105th
Congo, Democratic Republic of the rank
105th
Dealing with construction permits: Building quality control index over time
- Bangladesh
- Congo, Democratic Republic of the
How they compare
Bangladesh currently reports 66.67 against 66.67 in Congo, Democratic Republic of the, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Bangladesh ahead.
Bangladesh ranks 105th and Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 105th of 191 countries.
Bangladesh has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: building quality control index, Bangladesh or Congo, Democratic Republic of the?
- Bangladesh, at 66.67 against 66.67 in Congo, Democratic Republic of the as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: building quality control index between Bangladesh and Congo, Democratic Republic of the?
- 0, with Bangladesh ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Congo, Democratic Republic of the?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Bangladesh and Congo, Democratic Republic of the rank globally for dealing with construction permits: building quality control index?
- Bangladesh ranks 105th and Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 105th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Building quality control index (0-15) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the building quality control index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.