Bolivia, Plurinational State of vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Dealing with construction permits: Building quality control index
Bolivia, Plurinational State of
46.67
in 2019
Saint Kitts and Nevis
46.67
in 2019
Bolivia, Plurinational State of rank
151st
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
151st
Dealing with construction permits: Building quality control index over time
- Bolivia, Plurinational State of
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Bolivia, Plurinational State of currently reports 46.67 against 46.67 in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Saint Kitts and Nevis has been ahead every year.
Bolivia, Plurinational State of ranks 151st and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 151st of 191 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: building quality control index, Bolivia, Plurinational State of or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Bolivia, Plurinational State of, at 46.67 against 46.67 in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: building quality control index between Bolivia, Plurinational State of and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 0, with Bolivia, Plurinational State of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia, Plurinational State of and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Bolivia, Plurinational State of and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for dealing with construction permits: building quality control index?
- Bolivia, Plurinational State of ranks 151st and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 151st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Building quality control index (0-15) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the building quality control index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.