Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Iran, Islamic Republic of: Dealing with construction permits: Building quality control index
Bosnia and Herzegovina
86.67
in 2019
Iran, Islamic Republic of
90
in 2019
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
23rd
Iran, Islamic Republic of rank
22nd
Dealing with construction permits: Building quality control index over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Iran, Islamic Republic of
How they compare
Iran, Islamic Republic of currently reports 90 against 86.67 in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 3.33.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Iran, Islamic Republic of has been ahead every year.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 23rd and Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 22nd of 191 countries.
Iran, Islamic Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: building quality control index, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Iran, Islamic Republic of?
- Iran, Islamic Republic of, at 90 against 86.67 in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: building quality control index between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Iran, Islamic Republic of?
- 3.33, with Iran, Islamic Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Iran, Islamic Republic of?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Iran, Islamic Republic of rank globally for dealing with construction permits: building quality control index?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 23rd and Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 22nd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Building quality control index (0-15) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the building quality control index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.