Chad vs Denmark: Dealing with construction permits: Building quality control index (0-1

Chad
76.67
in 2019
Denmark
73.33
in 2019
Chad rank
79th
Denmark rank
80th

Dealing with construction permits: Building quality control index (0-1 over time

  • Chad
  • Denmark
020406080201420162019

How they compare

Chad currently reports 76.67 against 73.33 in Denmark, a difference of 3.34.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Chad has been ahead every year.

Chad ranks 79th and Denmark ranks 80th of 188 countries.

Chad has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits: building quality control index (0-1, Chad or Denmark?
Chad, at 76.67 against 73.33 in Denmark as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: building quality control index (0-1 between Chad and Denmark?
3.34, with Chad ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Denmark?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Chad and Denmark rank globally for dealing with construction permits: building quality control index (0-1?
Chad ranks 79th and Denmark ranks 80th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Building quality control index (0-15) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits: Building quality control index (0-15) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the building quality control index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.