Democratic Republic of Congo vs Papua New Guinea: Dealing with construction permits: Building quality control index
Democratic Republic of Congo
66.67
in 2019
Papua New Guinea
66.67
in 2019
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
105th
Papua New Guinea rank
105th
Dealing with construction permits: Building quality control index over time
- Democratic Republic of Congo
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Democratic Republic of Congo currently reports 66.67 against 66.67 in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Papua New Guinea has been ahead every year.
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 105th and Papua New Guinea ranks 105th of 191 countries.
Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: building quality control index, Democratic Republic of Congo or Papua New Guinea?
- Democratic Republic of Congo, at 66.67 against 66.67 in Papua New Guinea as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: building quality control index between Democratic Republic of Congo and Papua New Guinea?
- 0, with Democratic Republic of Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and Papua New Guinea?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Democratic Republic of Congo and Papua New Guinea rank globally for dealing with construction permits: building quality control index?
- Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 105th and Papua New Guinea ranks 105th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Building quality control index (0-15) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the building quality control index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.