Congo, Democratic Republic of the vs Poland: Dealing with construction permits: Building quality control index
Congo, Democratic Republic of the
66.67
in 2019
Poland
66.67
in 2019
Congo, Democratic Republic of the rank
105th
Poland rank
105th
Dealing with construction permits: Building quality control index over time
- Congo, Democratic Republic of the
- Poland
How they compare
Congo, Democratic Republic of the currently reports 66.67 against 66.67 in Poland, a difference of 0.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Poland has been ahead every year.
Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 105th and Poland ranks 105th of 190 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: building quality control index, Congo, Democratic Republic of the or Poland?
- Congo, Democratic Republic of the, at 66.67 against 66.67 in Poland as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: building quality control index between Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Poland?
- 0, with Congo, Democratic Republic of the ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Poland?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Poland rank globally for dealing with construction permits: building quality control index?
- Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 105th and Poland ranks 105th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Building quality control index (0-15) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the building quality control index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.