Ecuador vs Namibia: Dealing with construction permits: Building quality control index (0-1

Ecuador
53.33
in 2019
Namibia
56.67
in 2019
Ecuador rank
135th
Namibia rank
132nd

Dealing with construction permits: Building quality control index (0-1 over time

  • Ecuador
  • Namibia
0204060201420162019

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 56.67 against 53.33 in Ecuador, a difference of 3.34.

That makes Namibia's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.

Ecuador ranks 135th and Namibia ranks 132nd of 188 countries.

Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits: building quality control index (0-1, Ecuador or Namibia?
Namibia, at 56.67 against 53.33 in Ecuador as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: building quality control index (0-1 between Ecuador and Namibia?
3.34, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Namibia?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Ecuador and Namibia rank globally for dealing with construction permits: building quality control index (0-1?
Ecuador ranks 135th and Namibia ranks 132nd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Building quality control index (0-15) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits: Building quality control index (0-15) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the building quality control index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.