Lao People's Democratic Republic vs Seychelles: Dealing with construction permits: Building quality control index
Dealing with construction permits: Building quality control index over time
- Lao People's Democratic Republic
- Seychelles
How they compare
Lao People's Democratic Republic currently reports 43.33 against 40 in Seychelles, a difference of 3.33.
That makes Lao People's Democratic Republic's figure about 1.1 times Seychelles's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Lao People's Democratic Republic has been ahead every year.
Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 159th and Seychelles ranks 162nd of 190 countries.
Lao People's Democratic Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: building quality control index, Lao People's Democratic Republic or Seychelles?
- Lao People's Democratic Republic, at 43.33 against 40 in Seychelles as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: building quality control index between Lao People's Democratic Republic and Seychelles?
- 3.33, with Lao People's Democratic Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lao People's Democratic Republic and Seychelles?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Lao People's Democratic Republic and Seychelles rank globally for dealing with construction permits: building quality control index?
- Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 159th and Seychelles ranks 162nd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Building quality control index (0-15) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the building quality control index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.