Libya vs Marshall Islands, Republic of the: Dealing with construction permits: Building quality control index
Libya
0
in 2019
Marshall Islands, Republic of the
6.67
in 2019
Libya rank
185th
Marshall Islands, Republic of the rank
183rd
Dealing with construction permits: Building quality control index over time
- Libya
- Marshall Islands, Republic of the
How they compare
Marshall Islands, Republic of the currently reports 6.67 against 0 in Libya, a difference of 6.67.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Marshall Islands, Republic of the has been ahead every year.
Libya ranks 185th and Marshall Islands, Republic of the ranks 183rd of 190 countries.
Marshall Islands, Republic of the has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: building quality control index, Libya or Marshall Islands, Republic of the?
- Marshall Islands, Republic of the, at 6.67 against 0 in Libya as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: building quality control index between Libya and Marshall Islands, Republic of the?
- 6.67, with Marshall Islands, Republic of the ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Marshall Islands, Republic of the?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Libya and Marshall Islands, Republic of the rank globally for dealing with construction permits: building quality control index?
- Libya ranks 185th and Marshall Islands, Republic of the ranks 183rd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Building quality control index (0-15) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the building quality control index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.