Solomon Islands vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Dealing with construction permits: Building quality control index
Solomon Islands
53.33
in 2019
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
53.33
in 2019
Solomon Islands rank
138th
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank
138th
Dealing with construction permits: Building quality control index over time
- Solomon Islands
- Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
How they compare
Solomon Islands currently reports 53.33 against 53.33 in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, a difference of 0.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines has been ahead every year.
Solomon Islands ranks 138th and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 138th of 191 countries.
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: building quality control index, Solomon Islands or Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- Solomon Islands, at 53.33 against 53.33 in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: building quality control index between Solomon Islands and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- 0, with Solomon Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Solomon Islands and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Solomon Islands and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank globally for dealing with construction permits: building quality control index?
- Solomon Islands ranks 138th and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 138th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Building quality control index (0-15) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the building quality control index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.