Angola vs Papua New Guinea: Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score
Angola
94.9%
in 2019
Papua New Guinea
94.6%
in 2019
Angola rank
48th
Papua New Guinea rank
51st
Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score over time
- Angola
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Angola currently reports 94.9% against 94.6% in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0.3%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.
Angola ranks 48th and Papua New Guinea ranks 51st of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 1 and Papua New Guinea in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 80.2% | 80.4% | 0.2% | Papua New Guinea |
| 2010s | 91.0% | 90.5% | 0.5% | Angola |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score, Angola or Papua New Guinea?
- Angola, at 94.9% against 94.6% in Papua New Guinea as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score between Angola and Papua New Guinea?
- 0.3%, with Angola ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Papua New Guinea?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Angola and Papua New Guinea rank globally for dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score?
- Angola ranks 48th and Papua New Guinea ranks 51st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.