Antigua and Barbuda vs Comoros: Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score
Antigua and Barbuda
93.0%
in 2019
Comoros
92.6%
in 2019
Antigua and Barbuda rank
63rd
Comoros rank
65th
Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score over time
- Antigua and Barbuda
- Comoros
How they compare
Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 93.0% against 92.6% in Comoros, a difference of 0.4%.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Antigua and Barbuda has been ahead every year.
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 63rd and Comoros ranks 65th of 191 countries.
Antigua and Barbuda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Antigua and Barbuda | Comoros | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 90.1% | 85.0% | 5.1% | Antigua and Barbuda |
| 2010s | 91.5% | 87.5% | 4.0% | Antigua and Barbuda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score, Antigua and Barbuda or Comoros?
- Antigua and Barbuda, at 93.0% against 92.6% in Comoros as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score between Antigua and Barbuda and Comoros?
- 0.4%, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Comoros?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Antigua and Barbuda and Comoros rank globally for dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score?
- Antigua and Barbuda ranks 63rd and Comoros ranks 65th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.