Antigua and Barbuda vs Malaysia: Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score
Antigua and Barbuda
93.0%
in 2019
Malaysia
93.3%
in 2019
Antigua and Barbuda rank
63rd
Malaysia rank
60th
Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score over time
- Antigua and Barbuda
- Malaysia
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 93.3% against 93.0% in Antigua and Barbuda, a difference of 0.3%.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Malaysia has been ahead every year.
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 63rd and Malaysia ranks 60th of 191 countries.
Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Antigua and Barbuda | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 90.1% | 99.1% | 8.9% | Malaysia |
| 2010s | 91.5% | 94.9% | 3.4% | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score, Antigua and Barbuda or Malaysia?
- Malaysia, at 93.3% against 93.0% in Antigua and Barbuda as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score between Antigua and Barbuda and Malaysia?
- 0.3%, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Malaysia?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Antigua and Barbuda and Malaysia rank globally for dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score?
- Antigua and Barbuda ranks 63rd and Malaysia ranks 60th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.