Australia vs Switzerland: Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score
Australia
96.9%
in 2019
Switzerland
96.5%
in 2019
Australia rank
34th
Switzerland rank
37th
Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score over time
- Australia
- Switzerland
How they compare
Australia currently reports 96.9% against 96.5% in Switzerland, a difference of 0.4%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 34th and Switzerland ranks 37th of 191 countries.
Switzerland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Switzerland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 95.8% | 95.9% | 0.1% | Switzerland |
| 2010s | 96.0% | 96.4% | 0.4% | Switzerland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score, Australia or Switzerland?
- Australia, at 96.9% against 96.5% in Switzerland as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score between Australia and Switzerland?
- 0.4%, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Switzerland?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Australia and Switzerland rank globally for dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score?
- Australia ranks 34th and Switzerland ranks 37th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.