Azerbaijan vs Brunei Darussalam: Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score
Azerbaijan
91.4%
in 2019
Brunei Darussalam
90.9%
in 2019
Azerbaijan rank
72nd
Brunei Darussalam rank
74th
Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score over time
- Azerbaijan
- Brunei Darussalam
How they compare
Azerbaijan currently reports 91.4% against 90.9% in Brunei Darussalam, a difference of 0.5%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Brunei Darussalam ahead.
Azerbaijan ranks 72nd and Brunei Darussalam ranks 74th of 191 countries.
Brunei Darussalam has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Brunei Darussalam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 37.6% | 98.2% | 60.6% | Brunei Darussalam |
| 2010s | 73.5% | 94.8% | 21.3% | Brunei Darussalam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score, Azerbaijan or Brunei Darussalam?
- Azerbaijan, at 91.4% against 90.9% in Brunei Darussalam as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score between Azerbaijan and Brunei Darussalam?
- 0.5%, with Azerbaijan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Brunei Darussalam?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2019.
- How do Azerbaijan and Brunei Darussalam rank globally for dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score?
- Azerbaijan ranks 72nd and Brunei Darussalam ranks 74th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.