Botswana vs Taiwan, China: Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score
Botswana
98.2%
in 2019
Taiwan, China
98.0%
in 2019
Botswana rank
18th
Taiwan, China rank
21st
Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score over time
- Botswana
- Taiwan, China
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 98.2% against 98.0% in Taiwan, China, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Taiwan, China ahead.
Botswana ranks 18th and Taiwan, China ranks 21st of 191 countries.
Taiwan, China has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Taiwan, China | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 71.4% | 97.2% | 25.8% | Taiwan, China |
| 2010s | 92.3% | 97.8% | 5.5% | Taiwan, China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score, Botswana or Taiwan, China?
- Botswana, at 98.2% against 98.0% in Taiwan, China as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score between Botswana and Taiwan, China?
- 0.2%, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Taiwan, China?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Botswana and Taiwan, China rank globally for dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score?
- Botswana ranks 18th and Taiwan, China ranks 21st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.