Brunei Darussalam vs Grenada: Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score
Brunei Darussalam
90.9%
in 2019
Grenada
91.2%
in 2019
Brunei Darussalam rank
74th
Grenada rank
73rd
Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score over time
- Brunei Darussalam
- Grenada
How they compare
Grenada currently reports 91.2% against 90.9% in Brunei Darussalam, a difference of 0.3%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Brunei Darussalam ahead.
Brunei Darussalam ranks 74th and Grenada ranks 73rd of 191 countries.
Brunei Darussalam has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brunei Darussalam | Grenada | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 98.2% | 80.9% | 17.3% | Brunei Darussalam |
| 2010s | 94.8% | 88.6% | 6.1% | Brunei Darussalam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score, Brunei Darussalam or Grenada?
- Grenada, at 91.2% against 90.9% in Brunei Darussalam as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score between Brunei Darussalam and Grenada?
- 0.3%, with Grenada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brunei Darussalam and Grenada?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2019.
- How do Brunei Darussalam and Grenada rank globally for dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score?
- Brunei Darussalam ranks 74th and Grenada ranks 73rd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.