Burkina Faso vs Kiribati: Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score
Burkina Faso
62.1%
in 2019
Kiribati
58.6%
in 2019
Burkina Faso rank
151st
Kiribati rank
154th
Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score over time
- Burkina Faso
- Kiribati
How they compare
Burkina Faso currently reports 62.1% against 58.6% in Kiribati, a difference of 3.5%.
That makes Burkina Faso's figure about 1.1 times Kiribati's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Burkina Faso ahead.
Burkina Faso ranks 151st and Kiribati ranks 154th of 191 countries.
Burkina Faso has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Kiribati | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 17.3% | 7.5% | 9.8% | Burkina Faso |
| 2010s | 52.1% | 38.3% | 13.8% | Burkina Faso |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score, Burkina Faso or Kiribati?
- Burkina Faso, at 62.1% against 58.6% in Kiribati as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score between Burkina Faso and Kiribati?
- 3.5%, with Burkina Faso ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Kiribati?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Burkina Faso and Kiribati rank globally for dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score?
- Burkina Faso ranks 151st and Kiribati ranks 154th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.