Burundi vs Zimbabwe: Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score
Burundi
39.4%
in 2019
Zimbabwe
37.1%
in 2019
Burundi rank
170th
Zimbabwe rank
171st
Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score over time
- Burundi
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Burundi currently reports 39.4% against 37.1% in Zimbabwe, a difference of 2.3%.
That makes Burundi's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Burundi ranks 170th and Zimbabwe ranks 171st of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Burundi averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burundi | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0% | 71.9% | 71.9% | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 25.6% | 10.6% | 15.0% | Burundi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score, Burundi or Zimbabwe?
- Burundi, at 39.4% against 37.1% in Zimbabwe as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score between Burundi and Zimbabwe?
- 2.3%, with Burundi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Zimbabwe?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Burundi and Zimbabwe rank globally for dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score?
- Burundi ranks 170th and Zimbabwe ranks 171st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.