Cape Verde vs Russian Federation: Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score
Cape Verde
94.9%
in 2019
Russian Federation
94.6%
in 2019
Cape Verde rank
47th
Russian Federation rank
50th
Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score over time
- Cape Verde
- Russian Federation
How they compare
Cape Verde currently reports 94.9% against 94.6% in Russian Federation, a difference of 0.3%.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Cape Verde has been ahead every year.
Cape Verde ranks 47th and Russian Federation ranks 50th of 191 countries.
Cape Verde has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cape Verde | Russian Federation | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 91.0% | 60.7% | 30.3% | Cape Verde |
| 2010s | 94.1% | 89.4% | 4.7% | Cape Verde |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score, Cape Verde or Russian Federation?
- Cape Verde, at 94.9% against 94.6% in Russian Federation as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score between Cape Verde and Russian Federation?
- 0.3%, with Cape Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Russian Federation?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Cape Verde and Russian Federation rank globally for dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score?
- Cape Verde ranks 47th and Russian Federation ranks 50th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.