Cape Verde vs United Kingdom: Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score
Cape Verde
94.9%
in 2019
United Kingdom
94.6%
in 2019
Cape Verde rank
47th
United Kingdom rank
49th
Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score over time
- Cape Verde
- United Kingdom
How they compare
Cape Verde currently reports 94.9% against 94.6% in United Kingdom, a difference of 0.3%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was United Kingdom ahead.
Cape Verde ranks 47th and United Kingdom ranks 49th of 191 countries.
United Kingdom has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cape Verde | United Kingdom | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 91.0% | 94.9% | 3.9% | United Kingdom |
| 2010s | 94.1% | 94.2% | 0.2% | United Kingdom |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score, Cape Verde or United Kingdom?
- Cape Verde, at 94.9% against 94.6% in United Kingdom as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score between Cape Verde and United Kingdom?
- 0.3%, with Cape Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and United Kingdom?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Cape Verde and United Kingdom rank globally for dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score?
- Cape Verde ranks 47th and United Kingdom ranks 49th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.