Democratic Republic of Congo vs Ethiopia: Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score
Democratic Republic of Congo
31.0%
in 2019
Ethiopia
37.1%
in 2019
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
174th
Ethiopia rank
172nd
Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score over time
- Democratic Republic of Congo
- Ethiopia
How they compare
Ethiopia currently reports 37.1% against 31.0% in Democratic Republic of Congo, a difference of 6.1%.
That makes Ethiopia's figure about 1.2 times Democratic Republic of Congo's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Ethiopia ahead.
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 174th and Ethiopia ranks 172nd of 191 countries.
Ethiopia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Democratic Republic of Congo | Ethiopia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0% | 10.6% | 10.6% | Ethiopia |
| 2010s | 17.2% | 29.9% | 12.7% | Ethiopia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score, Democratic Republic of Congo or Ethiopia?
- Ethiopia, at 37.1% against 31.0% in Democratic Republic of Congo as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score between Democratic Republic of Congo and Ethiopia?
- 6.1%, with Ethiopia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and Ethiopia?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Democratic Republic of Congo and Ethiopia rank globally for dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score?
- Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 174th and Ethiopia ranks 172nd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.