Costa Rica vs Kazakhstan: Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score
Costa Rica
90.1%
in 2019
Kazakhstan
89.6%
in 2019
Costa Rica rank
82nd
Kazakhstan rank
84th
Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score over time
- Costa Rica
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 90.1% against 89.6% in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0.5%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 82nd and Kazakhstan ranks 84th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 1 and Kazakhstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 85.0% | 75.4% | 9.6% | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 89.2% | 90.1% | 0.9% | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score, Costa Rica or Kazakhstan?
- Costa Rica, at 90.1% against 89.6% in Kazakhstan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score between Costa Rica and Kazakhstan?
- 0.5%, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Kazakhstan?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Costa Rica and Kazakhstan rank globally for dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score?
- Costa Rica ranks 82nd and Kazakhstan ranks 84th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.