Côte d'Ivoire vs Mozambique: Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score
Côte d'Ivoire
70.5%
in 2019
Mozambique
69.9%
in 2019
Côte d'Ivoire rank
139th
Mozambique rank
140th
Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score over time
- Côte d'Ivoire
- Mozambique
How they compare
Côte d'Ivoire currently reports 70.5% against 69.9% in Mozambique, a difference of 0.6%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Côte d'Ivoire ahead.
Côte d'Ivoire ranks 139th and Mozambique ranks 140th of 191 countries.
Côte d'Ivoire has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Côte d'Ivoire | Mozambique | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 65.4% | 40.3% | 25.2% | Côte d'Ivoire |
| 2010s | 72.0% | 65.5% | 6.4% | Côte d'Ivoire |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score, Côte d'Ivoire or Mozambique?
- Côte d'Ivoire, at 70.5% against 69.9% in Mozambique as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score between Côte d'Ivoire and Mozambique?
- 0.6%, with Côte d'Ivoire ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Côte d'Ivoire and Mozambique?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Côte d'Ivoire and Mozambique rank globally for dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score?
- Côte d'Ivoire ranks 139th and Mozambique ranks 140th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.