Denmark vs Micronesia (country): Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score
Denmark
97.1%
in 2019
Micronesia (country)
97.1%
in 2019
Denmark rank
31st
Micronesia (country) rank
32nd
Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score over time
- Denmark
- Micronesia (country)
How they compare
Denmark currently reports 97.1% against 97.1% in Micronesia (country), a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Micronesia (country) ahead.
Denmark ranks 31st and Micronesia (country) ranks 32nd of 191 countries.
Micronesia (country) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Denmark | Micronesia (country) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 93.7% | 95.9% | 2.2% | Micronesia (country) |
| 2010s | 92.5% | 97.1% | 4.6% | Micronesia (country) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score, Denmark or Micronesia (country)?
- Denmark, at 97.1% against 97.1% in Micronesia (country) as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score between Denmark and Micronesia (country)?
- 0.0%, with Denmark ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Micronesia (country)?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Denmark and Micronesia (country) rank globally for dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score?
- Denmark ranks 31st and Micronesia (country) ranks 32nd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.