Djibouti vs Indonesia: Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score
Djibouti
76.2%
in 2019
Indonesia
77.4%
in 2019
Djibouti rank
129th
Indonesia rank
126th
Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score over time
- Djibouti
- Indonesia
How they compare
Indonesia currently reports 77.4% against 76.2% in Djibouti, a difference of 1.2%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Djibouti ahead.
Djibouti ranks 129th and Indonesia ranks 126th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Djibouti averaged higher in 1 and Indonesia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Djibouti | Indonesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 70.5% | 58.9% | 11.5% | Djibouti |
| 2010s | 68.3% | 74.1% | 5.9% | Indonesia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score, Djibouti or Indonesia?
- Indonesia, at 77.4% against 76.2% in Djibouti as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score between Djibouti and Indonesia?
- 1.2%, with Indonesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and Indonesia?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Djibouti and Indonesia rank globally for dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score?
- Djibouti ranks 129th and Indonesia ranks 126th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.